Am Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:36:11 +0200 schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com>:
> On 2012-10-16 20:39, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > > > Ah OK, sorry. There is no direct way of course. But assuming that it > > semantically makes sense to import a package and because it's necessary > > to look at some kind of documentation before importing anything anyway, > > I guess that could be a tolerable shortcoming. > > Yeah, I would still prefer "import foo.bar.*" though. Just an observation... import fuji: filesystem, render, matrix, material, primitive, system, font; import std: xml, string, conv, random, algorithm; ...is very easy on the eyes. It gives you that natural "in package std, there are the modules xml, string, ..." representation without repeatedly stating "fuji." or "std.". -- Marco
