On 2012-10-30 18:34, Brad Roberts wrote:
I'm all for idealistic views, but neither of those matches reality in any meaningful way. What I outlined is actually practical.
Well yes, for an already existing tool. But I see no reason why one wouldn't use this approach when developing a new tool. Lately, all my tools I write are built as libraries and a fairly thin executable that calls the library. Except that one can use the library in other tools it separates and modularize the code, easier to test and so on.
-- /Jacob Carlborg