On 10/30/12 2:13 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 07:43:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/29/2012 11:08 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
void foo();
There will be no line information for the above.
> void main()
> {
> foo();
For this, yes, but that is not what is being asked for.
Well, personally I think I would enjoy having this line number. The more
information the better.
Not sure I'm following but essentially if foo() is undefined the most
interesting file/line references would be for all calls to foo(). The
lines declaring foo() are nice to have but much less interesting.
Andrei
