On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:04:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:

The thread contains some sad comments:

It's unfortunate that there's still bad press circulating about a situation that is long gone. I suppose you just have to try and ignore those people.

A more interesting comment is this one:

"But the real problem here is that in order to achieve even that, the complexity and amount of concepts you have to deal with in C++11 is mind boggling."

The same is true in D. Well-written D code often does look rather elegant, but the amount of understanding needed to write beautiful D code is staggering.

I have to agree having to deal with lots of concepts.

On the other hand, except for the programming drones, most D concepts are also available in most mainstream languages.

--
Paulo

Reply via email to