On 1 November 2012 17:58, Gor Gyolchanyan <gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> OR, better yet:
>
> mixin MyMixin
> {
> foreach(i; 0..10)
> MyMixin ~= "writeln(" ~ to!string(i); ~ ");\n"'
> }
>
> And this could be printed out as a pragma(msg, ...) or into a .log file or
> anywhere else. This way it's easy to see what did end up being mixed in.
>
I bumped into this today actually. It's certainly a nice idea.
I see a lot of noise about said AST macros...
I understand the idea, but I have no idea how it might look in practice.
Are there any working proposals?
I find myself using mixins waaaay too much. They're just too convenient,
and enable lots of things that just aren't possible any other way. But I
always feel really dirty! It can be so tedious dealing with all the string
mess.
