On Thursday 26 January 2006 00:21, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> Lost in the rhetoric against Winlink....is the real reason for
> RM-11305/6.....
>
> There is a third Camp...those of us who love to experiment [isn't that one
> of the reasons for amateur radio]  who are kept in technology jail by the
> current outmoded regulation by mode....
>
> US Hams are falling further and further behind in "advancing the art of
> radio" because we are shackled by the archaic rules..
>
> And frankly RM-11306 does not go nearly far enough in freeing us from
> Technolgy Jail...
>

*EXACTLY* what experimentation is being held back, Howard? 

This was discussed in a thread right here not three weeks ago and the 
conclusion was that this was a false claim.

So tell us --  exactly what experimentation is being held back?

I can tell you what experimentation will be held back by the bandwidth 
regulation proposal --   digital modes using adaptive bandwidth techniques. 
You won't be able to go from narrow to wide to narrow to wide unless you do 
it in the wideband area along with all the other wideband digital and analog 
signals - like the high powered SSB. That's going to be a hell of place to 
find a spot to experiment in, isn't it?

But the ARRL -- and you apparently -- aren't concerned at all about that, 
right? That kind of experimentation isn't part of your "third camp", I guess. 
You'd rather see the entire band full of high powered SSB and aggressive ARQ 
modes so NO experimentation on anything else will be possible.

tim ab0wr


Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to