While I have used MFSK16 a lot in the past, it seems that Olivia has supplanted it, even though Olivia is often a much wider signal and requires fairly robust settings to equal MFSK16 under difficult conditions. But from what I see on the print, a number of digitally active hams feel that Olivia is the better choice.
But what about the other modes mentioned below? Do any of you use these modes? Other than just trying them out via the sound card to see how they sound, I have not knowingly heard or worked MFSK8, Throb, ThrobX or DominoF. Are there conditions on HF that warrant the use of these modes? Or should they be considered replaced by the newer modes? Just having a lot of modes is not really the best thing in the long run. What makes a difference to me is having the right mode for the right conditions. This is especially true if you need high speed with very good HF condx vs. some kind of speed that will get through really difficult conditions such as the kind of conditions that stops Pactor signals from working, but still allows some of the digital sound card modes to keep working even though they are magnitudes slower under good condx. 73, Rick, KV9U Patrick Lindecker wrote: > Hello Dan, > > Yes USB for all digimodes (DominoEX being side band sensitive as all MFSK > (or IFK) modes). > > Note: I will propose in the next Multipsk version (with DominoEX), the > following frequencies: > MFSK16, MFSK8, THROB, THROBX, DominoF, DominoEX (USB) > 1838, 3580, 7037, 10147, 14080, 18105, 21080, 24929, 28080 Khz > > 73 > Patrick > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
