It seems to me that if the codes were in an international agreement the would not be "unspecified" as they are specified in said document.
The more likely scenario is you will find a list of codes allowed between those countries and the United States, and language stating unspecified codes are also permitted or not permitted. If it is not specifically listed in the agreement, it is unspecified. An opinion Mark Saunders, KJ7BS Glendale, AZ ============================================================ From: "jimkovar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2006/02/06 Mon PM 03:41:44 EST To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RM-11306 comments ============================================================ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
One of the proposals in RM-11306 is to remove a limitation in Section
97.307(b) that excludes the use of an "unspecified digital code"
(i.e., anything but Baudot, AMTOR, ASCII, CLOVER, G-TOR and PacTOR) in
RTTY or data transmissions "to a station in a country with which the
United States does not have an agreement permitting the code to be used."
Can anybody point me to a listing of international agreements the
United States has made that shows which "unspecified digital codes"
are allowed in amateur radio transmissions to stations in specific
foreign countries?
73, KC0HOS - Jim
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As of this morning, there are more than 800 comments filed at
> http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi .
>
> My unscientific sample shows the opposition/support ratio bo be around
> 20:1, with about a third objecting based on negative impact to AM and
> another third objecting based on negative impact from automatic
> stations.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
