":I disagree. Most ops don't *listen* to the data tones on a frequency. I
know I
don't. Nor do I sit there watching the waterfall while I am reading a
transmission or compose one to send. My guess is that most ops would never
hear or recognize a QRL in a mode different from the one they are using."

I believe this is the crux of the whole discussion.  The failure to listen
to a frequency before transmission is the problem.  That is why the
whole suggestion of the software being fail-safe by not transmitting has
come up.  Personally, it has gone beyond amateur radio, if one is not
sitting there and involved in the transmission/reception of traffic.  I
worked 30 years on the commercial/government side of telecommunications and
that is where this type of transmission belong, not here on the ham bands.





Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to