|
Ill continue to use RST, it means the same exact
thinig for digital, either the tones are good (9) or bad (something less than
9), and that is what makes the quality.
I have other things to worry about.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:23
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RSQ signal
reporting gains further support
that makes sense. Now if we can apply that to the
endless winlink arguments on here, I'd give them a 590
John
VE5MU
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:05
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] RSQ signal
reporting gains further support
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: vk3bgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb
23, 2006 4:40 AM
Subject: [mixw] RSQ signal reporting gains further
support
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
all,
You may be aware that the IARU Region 1 Conference September
2005
recommended that RSQ (Readability, Strength, Quality) replace
the
traditional RST reporting format for HF digital modes.
A copy
of the IARU recommendation and updated information on the RSQ
signal
reporting scheme can be found at http://rsq-info.net/
A dedicated RSQ
group has recently been established at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rsq_signal_reporting/
and you are
welcome to join a discussion there.
73, Graeme
VK3BGH
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.0.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.12/266 - Release Date:
2/21/06
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.0.0/267 - Release Date:
2/22/2006
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
