Re: [digitalradio] Analog-Digital Emergency Net?

[Dr. Howard S. White]

Gee Doc ....   Wouldn't it just be a lot easier to have regulation by bandwidth like most of the rest of the world and not have to be concerned with regulatory barriers to your net? __________________________________________________________ Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LA Website: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished" "Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires, 911" ----- Original Message ----- From: doc To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Analog-Digital Emergency Net? Perhaps Homeland Security could ask the FCC to grant permission for such a Net at the edge of CD/Digital and Phone? e.g. 7150, 14150, 28300? The more complex alternative would be to map out the necessary minimum of freqs (+/-) QRM on which alternative modes could be utilized. More complex but less challenging than asking the FCC to flex the regs, even for the sake of Homeland Security-relevant communications testing! doc > I have long wanted to be able to do this, here in the U.S., just like is > done now with SSTV on several HF bands. > > But what you propose is currently illegal on all HF amateur bands except > for 160 meters. > > Or did you mean that stations would QSY to the various required parts of > the band to operate these different modes? > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion) SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.