|
lets get back to talking about new digital modes...
with all the neat things we can do with
them....
and not burden the readers around the world with
petty US politics.
__________________________________________________________ Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LA Website: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished" "Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:01
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Poll results
for digitalradio
Maybe that 97.5 % just got so tried of hearing
the same
old complaint over and over and over
and over again. Some of us understand
that
this will happen no matter what the mode.
I even hate to bring
it up again fearing to start
it all over.
Some of the ideas that I
have seen are just to far
out of it and put a undo burden on one group
of
operators. CW ID every 5minutes and not
transmitting for 10 minutes
after asking if the
frequency is in use. If it's good got one
it's
should also be good for all.
At 10:11 PM
3/7/06, Danny Douglas wrote in part:
>"This is a meeting place to
discuss amateur radio digital applications such
>as RTTY, CW,
PSK31,PSK63, MFSK16, Olivia-MFSK, Contestia,RTTYM, Chip64,
>DominoEXj,
THROB, ALE, PACTOR, AMTOR, HELL, SSTV, Digital SSTV, and more.
>There
are several reflectors dedicated to these separate modes but this
>group
focuses on ALL digital modes."
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
