Not positive, but I THINK mfsk16 is one. In my understanding, there is never
more than one tone being transmitted at any one point in time, hence no
possibility of any mixing.

I may be wrong. Again. HA!


On 7/20/06, Bill Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>    ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:13:55 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >We have lots of comparisons of modes, but we don't
> but them side by side...how about a comparison list like this...
>
> >
> >mode -|- thruhput in WPM -|- %error free -|- robustness (%error free at
> what SNR) -|- Bandwidth
> >
> >You might have to qualify this by using certain power levels and receiver
> sensitivity.
> >
> >This would answer lots of questions concerning which mode was best.
>
> ------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------
>
> I would add another category: Requires linear amplification, yes or
> no.
>
> One of the great advantages of FSK RTTY is you can amplify it with
> anything, linear or not and no harm is done. I believe there may be
> other digital modes which may be capable of this but I haven't seen
> anyone come right out and say so. Are there?
>
> Willing to stand corrected,
>
> Bill, W6WRT
>
> 
>



-- 
73, Craig Cook - N7OR in Sandy, OR


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to