> Patrick Lindecker wrote: > Yes it would be a very good thing to compare all digital > modes with their respective qualities and weakness. > It would give ideas for new specifications of mode. > > For a much more fine description of the modes, see the F1ULT Pascal WEB site: > http://f1ult.free.fr/DIGIMODES/MULTIPSK/digimodesF6CTE_en
Thank you for the very valuable site! The site introduction suggests that the content only includes modes offered within MultiPSK. If that is so it would be incomplete. Any plans to add modes that are not in MultiPSK so that we may compare them all, please? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... somewhere in FL URL: bibleseven (dot) com Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
