Harv,

Are these two Pk 232MBX's Pactor I compatible? If so I'm interested in them.

Dave WB2FTX

Harv Nelson wrote:

I've got two pk-232's sitting here that haven't been used for a few years if anyone wants one I'll ship 'em anywhere. let me know what you think they're worth.

Harv Nelson, N9AI
Washburn, WI

On 12/30/06, Dave Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    In RTTY mode, WinWarbler can run a soundcard RTTY engine (MMTTY) in
    parallel with an external RTTY modem like your AEA232MBX, a KAM, an
    MFJ RTTY modem, or an SCS multimode controller. This can be used in
    two useful ways:

    1. to provide diversity decoding, which can improve your copy of RTTY
    DX in poor conditions

    2. to simultaneously copy a RTTY DX station operating split and his
    or her pileup, accelerating detection of the DX station's QSX
    frequency

    73,

    Dave, AA6YQ

    --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
    <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, "AD5VJ Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    wrote:

I have had an AEA 232MBX, in fact two of them, for quite some time
    now.

I used to use them all the time for RTTY and packet, but I am
    wondering if these units no longer any good for Ham Radio, because of
the advent of Computers, the Digital Software for RTTY and Telnet
    for spotting and the passing away of PACTOR I.

I know I can get upgrades for them for soundcard, ect. But is there
    any use in doing that since I run soundcard applications from
the computer. Are they of more advantage than the sound card on my
    computer or would I be wasting my time, money and effort?

Can someone tell me if these are good for *anything* viable these
    days or is it true that they are just dinosaurs now?

I cant understand how they are still being sold at such high prices
    new, if they are of no use, I just don't know what to use them
for that would be useful.

Thanks
Bob AD5VJ




Reply via email to