Sorry, that should have been
"If you would like to join the list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing your name, callsign, and a brief
description of your amateur radio software development activity."
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> re " I've often thought that we need a Yahoo! group for software
> developers, maybe Dave would like to kick this off? "
>
> OK. I've just created
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arswd/
>
> If you would like to join the list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing your name, callsign, and a brief
> description of your amateur radio software development activity.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <simon.brown@>
> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "cesco12342000" <cesco1@>
> > >
> > > TCP is complicated !
> > >
> > > Its easy to build a client (maybe), its more complicated to
build
> a
> > > server, and it's hard to build a server which reliably can
accept
> > > and
> > > handle multiple connections on one port !
> > >
> >
> > I will make my Windows code available if we ever embark on this
> project.
> > It's similar to a telnet server, runs as a background thread,
> accepts
> > unlimited connection and runs very efficiently. It's also simple -
> if you
> > ever see this code you'll understand it in a few minutes.
> >
> > TCP is the de-facto standard and IMO if more than good enough. I
> envisage a
> > few scenarios where UDP may be considered, but I don't want to
> start
> > complicating things now.
> >
> > I've often thought that we need a Yahoo! group for software
> developers,
> > maybe Dave would like to kick this off? I can offer web space for
> whatever
> > we may want including a vBulletin BBS (I'll have to check my
> licencing
> > conditions but it should be OK).
> >
> > Simon HB9DRV
> >
>
