Leight, >My understanding is that the modulation for the image is not related to >MFSK at all, so any digimode program that includes the MFSK image >routines would work. Yes, but in the program it's mixed (it was difficult to completly separate MFSK and SSTV in MFSK)
>The width is about the same as MFSK so it would not work with narrower modes, but with equal or wider it should. Yes, and with wider modes as Olivia 1000x32, the choice would be either to have a better quality image or a quicker image. But it would more fun to instead send an analogical SSTV image to send a very strongly compressed digital SSTV. 73 Patrick ----- Original Message ----- From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying? Patrick, My understanding is that the modulation for the image is not related to MFSK at all, so any digimode program that includes the MFSK image routines would work. The initiation is text, for which the reliability is required. The width is about the same as MFSK so it would not work with narrower modes, but with equal or wider it should. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 2:57 pm, Patrick Lindecker wrote: > Leight, > > Technically, you are right. All reliable modes (Olivia and DominoEX > mainly) could support SSTV images as in MFSK16. It is just work... > > 73 > > Patrick > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. >> >> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >> >> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:32 PM >> >> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying? >> >> Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I >> >> can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header >> specifying size sent in MFSK data. The offset needs to be set for the >> different Olivia widths, but that is about it. Am I confused? >> Leigh/WA5ZNU >> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 2:02 pm, Jose A. Amador wrote: >>> MFSK has a pro and a con. It is HARD to tune, but it may transmit >>> small images. > >
