--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rud Merriam wrote: > > After a comment off list from Demeter I checked the Pactor specifications. > > It uses DBPSK or DQPSK. > > > > Why do the reports about Pactor indicate it is more robust than the QEX > > article would indicate? > > > > > > Rud Merriam K5RUD > > ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX > > http://TheHamNetwork.net > > > Rud, > > If you go back to the DCC presentation of KN6KB of a few years back on his new > software modem...he measured the robustness of Pactor, MT63 and several other > modes and Pactor wasn't that much more robust than MT63 at a -5 dB SNR. > > If I invested a $K Buck or so in Pactor III and WinLink, I'd claim it was the > best thing since sliced bread...woudln't you? > > 73, > > Wa;t/K5YFW > Hi Walt,
Actually it is better if not many amateurs get a PTC-II modem since this way I and othe PACTOR 3 users have a better chance of connecting to a Winlink2000 PMBO and download our e-mail! Never thought about that have you? hi hi hi!!! 73 de Demetre SV1UY
