keyesbob wrote: > Sure, you don't have any argument about IPv6, BUT I just don't get how > all of this makes a ham TLD a bad idea. > > Mostly because people don't realize what goes into running the root (.) DNS servers whom are controlled by the IANA. There are serious technological hurtles that are involved running a TLD and putting time and effort into just having a W1AW.HAM url seems rather korny.
And trading 44/8 space for a .ham Top Level Domain seems a bad trade to me. Those are my objections... nothing more.
