I sent a patch in to WSJT converting from DTR/RTS based RS232 PTT to a 
serial command string (as an option); I showed sending "TX;" and "RX;" 
for example.  They said no thanks, and don't support hamlib either.  Not 
much you can do...
Leigh/WA5ZNU
> This has only been tested on Ubuntu 8.10 with a strong likelihood of 
> being true for other Linux's as well. What the situation is in Windoze 
> land I wouldn't know.
> The facts are: you can't just leave "PTT Port" empty, as the programs 
> won't Tx in that case, something needs to be entered that looks 
> sufficiently like a serial port to satisfy the PTT function of the 
> program. Since the ports of WSJT and WSPR I've dealt with for Linux 
> already had "/dev/ttyS0" in that field, and they "worked" even though 
> there was no actual HW behind that, everything looked healthy to me. 
> (I'm using a SignaLink USB since I'm using (mostly) a computer with no 
> built-in RS-232c ports, I could use a USB<->RS232C converter at the 
> price of adding to the cable fest, but I choose this route instead)
>
> If you want to know how to modify the SignaLink USB to decent 
> specifications look here: 
> http://www.frenning.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/SignaLinkUSB-mods.html
>
> The thing which has been giving me the willies, is that either program 
> would invariably fail after a longer  (several hours) or shorter 
> period of time - shorter if a failure has already happened on the boot 
> of the OS. Failure mode is invariably "address out of bounds in array 
> indexing".
>
> This finally let me onto the theory that although the kernel would 
> accept the port manipulation commands, it would just stack them away 
> somewhere until it couldn't handle any more, whereupon the application 
> would be given a bogus reference and wham.
>
> I then tried an old trick from my Unix days: in every *nix like OS 
> there is a "/dev/null" device, a character device that can't ever 
> overflow, because all commands and data sent to it are immediately 
> discarded, "sent to the grounding rod" so to speak.
>
> I'm happy to report that WSPR has just survived my 24 hour torture 
> test (25% Tx/Rx ratio), using "/dev/null" as the bogus "PTT Port", and 
> that I've just started the same test of WSJT7 in WSPR QSO-mode.
> -- 
> Vy 73 de OZ1PIF/5Q2M, Peter
>
> ** CW: Who? Me? You must be joking!! **
> email: peter(no-spam-filler)@frenning.dk
> http://www.frenning.dk/oz1pif.htm
> Ph. +45 4619 3239
> Snailmail:
> Peter Frenning
> Ternevej 23
> DK-4130 Viby Sj.
> Denmark
> ***********************************
>
>   
>  

Reply via email to