09/03/2009
 
Phil Cross G7mwh (crossg7...@btinternet.com)
 
common sence at last, its a hobby and should be enjoyed by all using all the 
different modes, and part of our excistance is to experiment and push the 
bounderies forward, would'nt our time be better spent fighting for our place in 
the modern world of communications than fighting each other, onwards and 
upwards my freinds lets do what we'r liecenced to do experimenting, pushing the 
bounderies and most of all enjoying our hobby, what we achieve is peace around 
the world through communication, lets not forget it.
phil

--- On Sun, 8/3/09, bruce mallon <wa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: bruce mallon <wa4...@yahoo.com>
Subject: [digitalradio] Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, 8 March, 2009, 10:59 PM











Now I feel it's a much different story. So to determine what the "standard 
operations" are, you really have to look around and look at magazines like RF 
design, Urgent Communications.

I WORK in public safety ......
 
 Our system here is ANALOG ..... both on the county and Jail systems .
 
We use 460 MHz at the jail  with no interest in going digital ....... it has no 
advantage to us.
 
The idea should be and should always be DIGITAL as well as ANALOG should both 
be acceptable . The idea they one mode should be phased out ( spark was because 
there was no way to clean it up and it was replaced by CW ) then this will no 
longer be a hobby ...
 
I should have the right to run my LITTLE LULU as much as someone does to run a 
TS-2000 
IF it is within the FCC rules. I run everything I can from AM to PSK-31 and 
don't have a problem with anyone running anything they want.
 
One reason I read what is posted here is to get ideas of what I might want to 
get involved with ... or not .... like D-Star.
 
I remember ths SSB/AM wars on 75 meters as a kid .... NO LIDS NO KIDS NO SPACE 
CADETS bunch with groups determined to stop SSB at any cost one can only hope 
that we don't go back to that ........
 
Enough said
Back to DX ...
 
Bruce














Reply via email to