Hi,

This sounds interesting...
I setup a database, I made a few functional mockups, and some more glue could 
be added.
I would also provide JSON and XML connectors, to feed the info.
Perhaps we can move this into an alpha status... who knows..

http://lnet.com.ar/wwn/index.php
http://lnet.com.ar/wwn/register.php
http://lnet.com.ar/wwn/login.php

I'd like to have some more time before sending you these links, but it is 
late.. and time to go to bed..

73s!
Javier LU8AJA

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote:
>
> Take at look at this "fake" web page http://www.obriensweb.com/whoiswhere.html
> 
> I was thinking about the idea of a "reverse DX cluster"  or an
> expansion of the concepts behind hrdlog.net  .  A plce to see who is
> QRV and where they are on the bands. Not DX spots, just who is where.
>    I had some private emails with a few people about the varying ideas
> and one correspondent crystallized the thoughts by using the term "who
> is where, now" ?  It was further suggested that what  is needed to
> facilitate the concept is a very easy uncomplicated process that does
> not take a lots of resources or bandwidth.  An idea that is easily
> enabled in most common log book software after one configures that
> software to interface with your rig.  The idea would take the
> frequency/mode info that all moderns rigs send, and populate a webpage
> via use of TCP or  UDP, possibly in to a XML format.
> 
> I created the fake webpage in the link above to start the idea
> rolling, an idea of what it may look like .  The page I put together
> is fairly crude, just something to start the idea cooking.
> 
> This would be a idea that is "free" , no having to pay an annual fee
> like some logging programs already require.
> 
> So, do we have any talent here that could take the idea and create it?
>  Then we could host it (I would volunteer) and try to persuade popular
> logging/rig control software authors to support it by adding the
> ability to send the data strings from their software.
> 
> Anyone take the idea further?
> 
> Andy K3UK
>


Reply via email to