CO2DC 7.035 @ 1216Z on the following modes.

thor4, olivia 4/125, olivia 16/500, and mt63-500 w/ short interleave.


philw de ka1gmn kn





On Fri, Oct 30, 2009at 4:55 AM, Andy obrien <k3uka...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> If people want to use those other modes ...go for it.  I did not include
> THOR or ALE400 because they are not common to all three software packages.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Phil Williams <ka1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What about ALE-400?  This is a mode that I have never used.  I have
>> finally installed mutlipsk which offers this mode.  I would sure like to get
>> some hands on with ALE-400.
>>
>> Oh yeah, I second the motion on Feld Hell.  Thanks KT.
>>
>> philw de ka1gmn
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Kurt Tuttle <k8...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   I would recommend FeldHell also.
>>>
>>> KT
>>> K8YZK
>>>
>>> --- On *Thu, 10/29/09, Phil Williams <ka1...@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Phil Williams <ka1...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's
>>> challenge
>>> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>> Date: Thursday, October 29, 2009, 7:13 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  What?  No THOR?! ;-)
>>>
>>> philw de ka1gmn
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM, obrienaj <k3uka...@gmail. 
>>> com<http://us.mc558.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=k3uka...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  We have had few new people join this group after the QST article on RS
>>>> ID. Since many of them are NEW to digital modes other than RTTY or PSK31...
>>>> I thought I would challenge the people who have not ventured away from 
>>>> PSK31
>>>> or RTTY to try a task this weekend. Three QSOs in three different modes. To
>>>> keep is focused, I suggest you choose from these 5 modes
>>>>
>>>> Olivia
>>>> Feld Hell
>>>> Domninoex
>>>> MFSK16
>>>> MT63
>>>>
>>>> If you have NO clue about these modes, great... just ask and we will get
>>>> you started. Choose Multipsk, Fldigi, or DM780 as your software and we can
>>>> help set up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>  
>

Reply via email to