According to every chart I see, Novices and Techs can operate 28.000 thru 
28.300 digital and 28.3-28.5 SSB phone.  My question is why would you want to 
get down in the lower portion of the data assignment, where most CW opration is 
taking place?  Your present 28.1 is out of that area, and would see4m to be to 
be causing much less interference to those CW stations.

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USASV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice)short stints at:  DA/PA/SU/HZ/7X/DU
CR9/7Y/KH7/5A/GW/GM/F
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.  
Moderator
DXandTALK
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Robert W Strohmeyer 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] USA Novice-Tech operations on 10M? [1 Attachment]


    [Attachment(s) from Robert W Strohmeyer included below] 



  Andy, see the attached chart.

  73 de Stro
  KO4FR

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: obrienaj 
    To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
    Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:41 AM
    Subject: [digitalradio] USA Novice-Tech operations on 10M?


      
    Has the USA's restriction on Novices/Technicians using 28.0 to 28.100 been 
eliminated ? The ARRL's band plan chart seems to indicate this. Because of this 
restriction PSK31 and RTTY on 10M used to operate around 28120 so that 
novice-techs could work them. I am looking for a 10M frequency to test a 
PSKMAIl server, perhaps I do not need to park above 28.100.

    Andy K3UK





    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4573 (20091104) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

    http://www.eset.com



  __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4573 (20091104) __________

  The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

  http://www.eset.com


  

Reply via email to