Hi Dave

"I'm no fan of the way in which many contest stations seem to use, and 
abuse, the band plans (..)"

I could not agree with you more. 

73 de LA5VNA Steinar








Dave Ackrill wrote:
> DANNY DOUGLAS wrote:
>> Bonnie, sitting on the side, I see both sides of this.  You, on one hand, 
>> always appear to be pushing expansion of new modes
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>   From: expeditionradio 
>
>>>   If you are really concerned about lids on HF, start with the #1 primary 
>>> source of QRM: contesters.
>
> I'm no fan of the way in which many contest stations seem to use, and 
> abuse, the band plans, but neither am I a fan of digital modes that, 
> maybe unintentionally at times, trample upon other legitimate users of 
> the bands either...
>
> Unfortunately, legislating against either abuse is both unlikely to work 
> and probably impossible to implement.
>
> Personally, I would like the organisers of the various contests to 
> enforce their own rules against persistent offenders.  However, 
> experience over many years suggests that they either will not, or dare 
> not, do this, which begs the question "why have the rules?"
>
> I would prefer that the DX community did not trample on top of people at 
> times, and listen before they transmitted and I would like the Band 
> Police to not transmit over the top of what they think should, or should 
> not, be done on a frequency.
>
> I would also like the ALE and digital community to recognise that they 
> share the bands with everyone else and are not immune from the 'listen 
> before use' rule either.
>
> However, these are just my 'would like to have' and are obviously not 
> shared by the majority, as they do not happen.
>
> Dave (G0DJA)
>


Reply via email to