+++ AA6YQ comments below

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Brabham" <n5...@...> wrote:

If WinMore was in the public domain, you might have a point there. When the 
WinLink group deep-sixes their proprietary software, then who can use it?

>>>We are discussing what is and is not possible in the domain of busy 
>>>detection. The capabilities of Winmor's busy frequency detector are what's 
>>>relevant to this discussion, not its long-term disposition. A key result of 
>>>Scamp was the recognition that a modest, first-iteration busy frequency 
>>>detector performed remarkably well.

   73,

       Dave, AA6YQ

Reply via email to