And ROS is legal because is not a SS modulation.
________________________________ De: John B. Stephensen <kd6...@comcast.net> Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:47 Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published? CHIP64 is legal above 222 MHz -- they're assuming that the user will notice that it's spread-spectrum and act accordingly. 73, John KD6OZH ----- Original Message ----- >From: jose alberto nieto ros >To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com >Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 23:30 UTC >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published? > > >Hi Bonnie, i saw in the first place of that list: Chip 64 explaining >clearly that Chip 64 is Spread Spectrum. > >Then, what have to say ARRL about it ? They are publishing a SS in his own >officcial website. Somebody can explain me what happen here? > > > > > > > > ________________________________ De: expeditionradio <expeditionradio@ yahoo.com> >Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com >Enviado: mié,24 febrero, 2010 23:20 >Asunto: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published? > > >> Jose wrote: >> if anywant know about ROS protocol is Jose Alberto Nieto Ros > >Hi Jose, > >Do you plan to publish documentation of a non-Spread Spectrum version of ROS >mode? > >Examples of public documentation: >http://www.arrl. org/FandES/ field/regulation s/techchar/ > >Best Wishes, >Bonnie Crystal KQ6XA > >FCC Rules for amateur radio service in USA >" §97.309(a)(4) Technical Descriptions >(4) An amateur station transmitting a RTTY or data emission using a digital >code specified in this paragraph may use any technique whose technical >characteristics have been documented publicly, such as CLOVER, G-TOR, or >PacTOR, for the purpose of facilitating communications. " > > >
