>>>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:29:23 -0500, KH6TY <kh...@comcast.net> said:
[snip] > It looks to me that the tone frequencies are clearly being generated > independently from the data and then the data applied to the randomly > generated frequency. There is NO pattern to ROS like there is to FSK > modes, even to 32 tone FSK (Olivia 32-1000) or to 64 tone FSK > (MT63-2000). This is a signature of FHSS. > “/If/ it walks /like a duck/, quacks /like a duck/, /looks like a duck/, > it must be a /duck/”. It sounds like US hams would run afowl of the law if they used ROS on HF, Skip. And then the FCC might waddle in and slap them all with a hefty bill. > It looks like ROS really is FHSS when you look at it on a spectrum > analyzer, and the spectrum analyzer does not lie. I guess ROS has taken a tern for the worse. And it doesn't help that it's author is now ducking the issue... :-P -- 73, Stelios, M0GLD.
