Why, given all that has happened, should one believe anything that is posted on that web site regarding the FCC?
As for those trying to justify the developer's behaviour, I don't see it. Peter G3PLX, Nino IZ8BLY and others managed to develop and introduce new modes without any of this kind of thing going on. No-one was "against" ROS, at least not from the outset. The FCC's initial opinion was a matter of fact, which some of us simply reported upon. Some people, including me, also expressed the view that 2.2KHz is too wide a transmission to have on the crowded HF bands. Whether or not you agree, I think it is a perfectly valid opinion to have without being blacklisted and other childish behaviour. If someone is too thin skinned to take any criticism they should avoid posting anything on the internet. Julian, G4ILO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote: > > From the ROS web page > (https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox/1272ea080e273b49) , > alleging that the ARRL views Chip64 not legal on HF. The language is > rather odd though. >
