On 06/06/2010 10:48 AM, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote: > At 03:22 AM 6/6/2010, you wrote: (in part) >> In the end, systems like ROS, Clover, PACKTOR-XXX, etc, where there is not >> full published trasparency in the encoding process, are not suitable for >> legal amateur use, in my humble opinion. > > In other words, no one has the right to make money from their > hard work and what could have been $$$ millions spent on research > and development as would have been the case with Pactor 3. Or the > right to protect it.
They can keep it secret all they want. I just do not believe amateur operators should use such protocols on the amateur bands. -- All rights reversed.
