Hi,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 05:48:09PM +0000, Gevel Tekens wrote:
I do not have a github account, so I am sending a patch as well as the
statements that enabled the patch. They have all been hand-checked.
This is what I hope is a low-effort improvement and ahead of the FOSDEM
2025 presentation.
Thanks, they look good. I will merge it with the corrections below:
diff -ruN a/dw/table.cc b/dw/table.cc
--- a/dw/table.cc 2025-01-12 17:14:01.000000000 +0100
+++ b/dw/table.cc 2025-01-18 18:46:05.481088753 +0100
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
// An alternative would be incremental resizing for tables; this
// approach resembles the behaviour before GROWS.
- // TODO Does it still make sence to return -1 when forceValue is
+ // TODO Does it still make sense, since to return -1 when forceValue is
Only s/sence/sense/ seems enough.
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@
* (which is used by DwTable!), and
* (ii) line1_offset is ignored (line1_offset_eff is set to 0),
* when line1_offset plus the width of the first word is
- * greater than the the line break witdh.
+ * greater than the the line break width.
Also s/the the/the/
diff -ruN a/lout/debug_rtfl.hh b/lout/debug_rtfl.hh
--- a/lout/debug_rtfl.hh 2025-01-12 17:14:01.000000000 +0100
+++ b/lout/debug_rtfl.hh 2025-01-18 18:46:05.725088575 +0100
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
// Prints an RTFL message to stdout. "fmt" contains simple format
// characters how to deal with the additional arguments (no "%"
-// preceeding, as in printf) or "q" (which additionally
+// preceding, proceeding, as in printf) or "q" (which additionally
Just s/preceeding/preceding/
Best,
Rodrigo.
_______________________________________________
Dillo-dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
