Quoting Ville Syrj?l? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:42:23PM +0100, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > > > Should IDirectFBDisplayLayer::WaitForSync respect this too? > > > > Does it sync on each field? > > Yes. WaitForSync() is more useful for single buffering so I'm not really > sure if there's any reason making this change. Then again why would the > user set DLOP_FIELD_PARITY and use WaitForSync() for both fields. Anyone > have useful scenarios to support either choice?
I think WaitForSync() should sync on the second field only if DLOP_FIELD_PARITY is set, because the Flip() is done each two fields, too. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" Convergence GmbH -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
