On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 21:16, Rob Shortt wrote:
> Ok, here's another set of output:
> 
> A:  11.6 V:  11.5 A-V:  0.017 ct:  0.071  338/338  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.6 V:  11.6 A-V: -0.008 ct:  0.070  339/339  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.6 V:  11.6 A-V:  0.000 ct:  0.070  340/340  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.6 V:  11.6 A-V: -0.000 ct:  0.070  341/341  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.7 V:  11.7 A-V: -0.012 ct:  0.069  342/342  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> waiting for irq
> bad field: 1
> A:  11.7 V:  11.7 A-V:  0.017 ct:  0.070  343/343  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.7 V:  11.7 A-V: -0.001 ct:  0.070  344/344  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> waiting for irq
> A:  11.8 V:  11.8 A-V:  0.017 ct:  0.072  345/345  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.8 V:  11.8 A-V: -0.014 ct:  0.071  346/346  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> A:  11.8 V:  11.8 A-V: -0.013 ct:  0.069  347/347  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> waiting for irq
> bad field: 1
> A:  11.9 V:  11.9 A-V:  0.005 ct:  0.070  348/348  14% 23%  0.9% 3 0 0%
> [ ... ]
> No longer 1:1.

Indeed.  Looks just like mine!  :-)  or should that be :-(

I am very interested in seeing your cle266 results of the above.

b.

-- 
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.

Brian J. Murrell

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to