On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 21:16, Rob Shortt wrote: > Ok, here's another set of output: > > A: 11.6 V: 11.5 A-V: 0.017 ct: 0.071 338/338 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.6 V: 11.6 A-V: -0.008 ct: 0.070 339/339 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.6 V: 11.6 A-V: 0.000 ct: 0.070 340/340 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.6 V: 11.6 A-V: -0.000 ct: 0.070 341/341 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.7 V: 11.7 A-V: -0.012 ct: 0.069 342/342 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > waiting for irq > bad field: 1 > A: 11.7 V: 11.7 A-V: 0.017 ct: 0.070 343/343 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.7 V: 11.7 A-V: -0.001 ct: 0.070 344/344 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > waiting for irq > A: 11.8 V: 11.8 A-V: 0.017 ct: 0.072 345/345 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.8 V: 11.8 A-V: -0.014 ct: 0.071 346/346 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > A: 11.8 V: 11.8 A-V: -0.013 ct: 0.069 347/347 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > waiting for irq > bad field: 1 > A: 11.9 V: 11.9 A-V: 0.005 ct: 0.070 348/348 14% 23% 0.9% 3 0 0% > [ ... ] > No longer 1:1.
Indeed. Looks just like mine! :-) or should that be :-( I am very interested in seeing your cle266 results of the above. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part