On 1/2/06, Kent Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/2/06, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kent Sandvik schrieb: > > > I've been postponing to put in a text-based theme format system in > > > place for LiTE. But I was wondering, in case LiTE understood primitive > > > CSS, would that help concerning the possible browser ports? --Kent > > > > I doubt that, because supporting CSS in the browser wouldn't go through > > the theming system. > > Yes, I started looking at the CSS specs, and yes, it's very > browser-centric, indeed. I could tweak the programmatic theme settings > so it's easier to change programmatically parts of the widgets, but > let this map up to the browser CSS services. --Kent >
You might want to look at how Mozilla integrates CSS and XUL. It may help with this type of problem. But CSS is pretty tightly tied to a DOM which would then mean you almost have to support a XULish xml for the themes. > _______________________________________________ > directfb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
