Mike Emmel wrote:
> I'm not sure about this
> - if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 )
> + if (id >= DIKI_0 && id <= DIKI_9 && !shift ){
> return DIKS_0 + id - DIKI_0;
> + } else {
> + switch(id) {
> + case DIKI_1: return DIKS_EXCLAMATION_MARK;
> + case DIKI_2: return DIKS_AT;
> + case DIKI_3: return DIKS_NUMBER_SIGN;
> + case DIKI_4: return DIKS_DOLLAR_SIGN;
> + case DIKI_5: return DIKS_PERCENT_SIGN;
> + case DIKI_6: return DIKS_CIRCUMFLEX_ACCENT;
> + case DIKI_7: return DIKS_AMPERSAND;
> + case DIKI_8: return DIKS_ASTERISK;
> + case DIKI_9: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_LEFT;
> + case DIKI_0: return DIKS_PARENTHESIS_RIGHT;
> + default:;
> + }
> + }
>
> I had code like this before and it broke things.
> I don't think you want to set the key_id to a DIKS.
> Can someone comment on this please.
> Denis ???
This is a part of the id_to_symbol() function, so it's correct
to return DIKS_* here, but I'm wondering why DIKI_1 translates to
an exclamation mark and not to DIKS_1 :)
--
Best regards,
Denis Oliver Kropp
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/ |
"------------------------------------------"
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-dev@directfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
