On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:23:42 +0300 Ville Syrj�l� wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:08:07AM +0000, Sarfraz Nawaz wrote: > > I've applied the full memory patch that came with Directfb-0.19 and > > things seem to work fine for the time being. fbset -i shows 32Meg. The > > vsync patch however, fails. > > 2.4.22 shouldn't need the vsync patch. The only thing you need to do is > make sure that FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC definition is in /usr/include/fb.h. > > > I still cannot get Directfb to compile with profiling support. I am not > > using the fusion patch. Everything compiles fine with > --enable-profiling. > > But when I run anything like dfbinfo it seg faults. Is there any other > > way to profile a Directfb program. > > I haven't tried profiling in a while. I know it used to work sometime last > spring. I don't remember if it required something special. > > -- > Ville Syrj�l� > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ > > > -- > Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject. > >
On my machine fb.h is in /usr/include/linux/ However, there is no FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC definition in it. How should I modify it. Regards This message powered by EMUmail. http://EMUmail.com '~��{.n�+���zwZ������j�b�ثy�_n���+a�{.n�+�����������j�.n7�
