On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:15:00PM +0300, Ville Syrj�l� wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:02:27PM +0200, Tom Schouten wrote: > > > > hi ville, > > > > from your readme.txt: > > > > 1: Unpack Mesa sources > > > > 2: Install DirectFBGL (cvs version required) > > $ ./autogen.sh --with-mesa=<path to Mesa sources> > > $ make > > # make install > > > > 3: Compile Mesa > > $ make > > > > 4: Compile mga drm kernel module (included in Mesa sources) > > $ cd src/kernel/drm > > $ make > > > > the make step in 2. fails because it can't find libGL > > in the mesa dir (not compiled yet): > > I forgot that DirectFBGL requires libGL (due to glFlush() I think) and > libGL with glx hack requires DirectFBGL :( I've always had a system libGL > installed so I hadn't noticed the problem. > > I think it should work if you do "make -k install" for DirectFBGL > (headers should get installed), then compile Mesa and then build and > install DiretFBGL for real. >
thanks. i got a bit further. seems Mesa needs Xlib.h and Xutil.h too.. i can install them, no problem, so i will try, but is it possible to compile it on an X-less system? > > <snip> > > i tried reversing 2 and 3 but this failed when running > > ./bootstrap: > > configure.in:87: required file `src/Trace/Makefile.in' not found > > You didn't follow the instructions here. Do not run bootstrap. > yeah, well. if the readme.txt does not compile, one can expect more undefined results when the compiler itself goes creative ;)
