Hi! Not sure - I'm using a gentoo ebuild originally written by Lucian Muresan. I'm not sure what this does differently to the standard build, but could look into it tonight. I'll give the CVS version a try as well.
Proposal: Might it be a good idea to have the version number for fusion track the kernel version number? Ie: linux-fusion-2.6.14, linux-fusion-2.6.15 -> That might make it easier for people to know which version to use. Or is the intent to always support all kernel versions in the latest version of fusion? Richard Unger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Denis Oliver Kropp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Jänner 2006 11:31 > An: Unger Richard > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [directfb-users] Kernel 2.6.15 and linux-fusion > > Unger Richard wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I was playing with kernel 2.6.15 at home last night. Anyone > else try it? > > I'm running into troubles with fusion: while the compile > seems clean, > > modprobe locks up trying to insmod the module, which does however > > appear in the list. > > > > Nothing I have been able to do subsequently (other than > rebooting ;) > > can get rid of that locked modprobe process. > > DFB apps then lock up attempting to access fusion, although > one can, > > in general, kill them. > > > > I'm using fusion-1.1 - is there reason to believe the CVS version > > might work with 2.6.15 ? > > Yes, I fixed it for 2.6.15, but I'm wondering why it built for you. > > -- > Best regards, > Denis Oliver Kropp > > .------------------------------------------. > | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | > | http://www.directfb.org/ | > "------------------------------------------" > _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
