Caglar Akyuz wrote: > Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: >> Caglar Akyuz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm very new to DirectFB and I've successfully cross compiled DirectFB >>> from latest git, at least without any errors. Now tutorials, examples, >>> tools are working without any errors. However, I'm not sure if it uses >>> DaVinci gfx driver or not. Of course I configured with option >>> --with-gfxdrivers=davinci. >>> >>> I tried "dfbinfo" tool, it showed that only one layer is supported and >>> no clue about the driver. When I use "dfb_dok" benchmark tool to test, >>> option "--dfb:no-hardware" makes no difference on the results. How can >>> be sure if I compiled DirectFB or not for my DM6446? >> Do you get any error message from the DirectFB driver? >> >> Something like "Davinci/Driver: FBIO_GET_TIMING failed!\n"? >> > > I wasn't but I'm now. At first I haven't copied/used directfbrc. After > your post I copied it and I received the following error(s). > > (*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2007-12-13 17:35) > (!) Davinci/Driver: FBIO_GET_TIMING failed! > --> Invalid argument
Please try copying your davincifb.h into gfxdrivers/davinci/ and rebuild the driver. > (*) DirectFB/Graphics: Generic Software Rasterizer 0.6 (directfb.org) > (!) DirectFB/WM: Window manager module 'sawman' not found! > (!) DirectFB/Core: Could not initialize 'wm_core' core! > --> No (suitable) implementation found! > (!) [ 1917: 0.000] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x10, invalid address) <-- > Aborted You can change the wm to "default". -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
