Added more debugging.
I have the following in the etc/directfbrc file.
debug
debugmem
debugshm
trace

Here is the output.
To me it looks like a problem with memcpy.  Has anyone seen this before?
This is an arm.



r...@mini2440:~# dfbinfo
(-) [  NO NAME         0.000] ( 1478) DirectFB/Config:    Unable to open
config file `/home/root/.directfbrc'!
(-) [  NO NAME         0.002] ( 1478) DirectFB/Config:    Unable to open
config file `/etc/directfbrc.dfbinfo'!
(-) [  NO NAME         0.002] ( 1478) DirectFB/Config:    Unable to open
config file `/home/root/.directfbrc.dfbinfo'!
(-) [  NO NAME         0.003] ( 1478) Direct/Main:
direct_initialize() called...
(-) [  NO NAME         0.004] ( 1478) Direct/Thread:
direct_thread_set_name( 'Main Thread' )
(-) [  NO NAME         0.004] ( 1478) Direct/Thread:            ->
attaching unknown thread 1478
(-) [  NO NAME         0.005] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
120 bytes [thread.c:369 in direct_thread_set_name()]
(-) [  NO NAME         0.006] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
12 bytes [thread.c:386 in direct_thread_set_name()] -> 0x14350 "
Main Thread"
(-) [Main Thread       0.007] ( 1478)
Direct/Main:        ...initializing now.
(-) [Main Thread       0.007] ( 1478) Direct/Signals:
Initializing...

   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| DirectFB 1.4.2 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        (c) 2001-2009  The world wide DirectFB Open Source Community
        (c) 2000-2004  Convergence (integrated media) GmbH
      ----------------------------------------------------------------

(-) [Main Thread       0.092] ( 1478) DirectFB/Core:
dfb_core_create...
(-) [Main Thread       0.093] ( 1478) Direct/Main:
direct_initialize() called...
(-) [Main Thread       0.093] ( 1478) Direct/Main:            ...2
references now.
(*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2009-10-05 17:59)
[ DEBUG ][ TRACE ]
(-) [Main Thread       0.095] ( 1478) Direct/Modules:
direct_modules_explore_directory( 'systems' )
(-) [Main Thread       0.098] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
44 bytes [modules.c:229 in direct_modules_explore_directory()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.099] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
22 bytes [modules.c:237 in direct_modules_explore_directory()] ->
0x143b8 "         libdirectfb_devmem.so"
(-) [Main Thread       0.100] ( 1478) Direct/Modules:
Loading '/usr/lib/directfb-1.4-0/systems/libdirectfb_devmem.so'...
(-) [Main Thread       0.124] ( 1478) Direct/Modules:
Registering 'devmem' ('systems')...
(-) [Main Thread       0.124] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:
+     7 bytes [modules.c:134 in direct_modules_register()] -> 0x15890 "
devmem"
(-) [Main Thread       0.125] ( 1478)
Direct/Modules:                 ...registered.
(-) [Main Thread       0.125] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
44 bytes [modules.c:229 in direct_modules_explore_directory()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.126] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:                   +
21 bytes [modules.c:237 in direct_modules_explore_directory()] ->
0x15978 "          libdirectfb_fbdev.so"
(-) [Main Thread       0.126] ( 1478) Direct/Modules:
Loading '/usr/lib/directfb-1.4-0/systems/libdirectfb_fbdev.so'...
(-) [Main Thread       0.218] ( 1478) Direct/Modules:
Registering 'fbdev' ('systems')...
(-) [Main Thread       0.219] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:
+     6 bytes [modules.c:134 in direct_modules_register()] -> 0x15cf0 "
fbdev"
(-) [Main Thread       0.219] ( 1478)
Direct/Modules:                 ...registered.
(-) [Main Thread       0.221] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:               +    44
bytes [core.c:297 in dfb_core_create()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.222] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:               +    24
bytes [thread.c:113 in direct_thread_add_init_handler()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.223] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:               +512000
bytes [memcpy.c:205 in direct_find_best_memcpy()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.224] ( 1478) Direct/Mem:               +512000
bytes [memcpy.c:208 in direct_find_best_memcpy()]
(-) [Main Thread       0.225] ( 1478) Direct/Memcpy:
Benchmarking memcpy methods (smaller is better):
(-) [Main Thread       0.280] ( 1478) Direct/Memcpy:            libc
14608
(!) [ 1478:    0.281] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x40c39008, invalid
address) <--
(-) [ 1478: -STACK- ]
sh: nm: not found
  #0  0x400fae0d in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdirect-1.4.so.0 [0x400f0000]
  #1  0x401045cc in direct_find_best_memcpy ()
from /usr/lib/libdirect-1.4.so.0 [0x400f0000]
sh: nm: not found
  #2  0x400b6014 in dfb_core_create ()
from /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 [0x40025000]
sh: nm: not found
  #3  0x00008748 in DirectFBCreate () from dfbinfo [0x8000]
  #4  0x0000898d in abort () from dfbinfo [0x8000]

Aborted


Thanks

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 13:18 +0200, Niels Roest wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> not sure but some hints.
> 
> (1) use "dfbinfo --dfb:debug" to turn on debug statements.. This might 
> print some clues.
> (2) build statically (--enable-static), put "nm" in your path, or copy 
> libdirect-1.4.so.nm next to *.so (e.a.) to get the complete stack trace.
> 
> hth
> Niels
> 
> ed wrote:
> > When I run dfbinfo I get the following.
> >
> > r...@mini2440:/# dfbinfo
> >
> >    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| DirectFB 1.4.2 |
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >         (c) 2001-2009  The world wide DirectFB Open Source Community
> >         (c) 2000-2004  Convergence (integrated media) GmbH
> >       ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2009-10-05 17:59)
> > [ DEBUG ][ TRACE ]
> > (!) [ 2127:    0.000] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x40c39008, invalid
> > address) <--
> > (-) [ 2127: -STACK- ]
> > sh: nm: not found
> >   #0  0x400fae0d in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdirect-1.4.so.0 [0x400f0000]
> >   #1  0x401045cc in direct_find_best_memcpy ()
> > from /usr/lib/libdirect-1.4.so.0 [0x400f0000]
> > sh: nm: not found
> >   #2  0x400b6014 in dfb_core_create ()
> > from /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 [0x40025000]
> > sh: nm: not found
> >   #3  0x00008748 in DirectFBCreate () from dfbinfo [0x8000]
> >   #4  0x0000898d in abort () from dfbinfo [0x8000]
> >
> > Aborted
> >
> > ============================================
> >
> > Any ideas what is wrong?
> >
> > Thanks
> > ed
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > directfb-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
> >
> >   
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users

Reply via email to