2011/10/13 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: > Hi Olivier, > I agree that things should be move on TL, anyway we should be prepared > on supporting the multi-module structure as discussed in the roadmap - > new components will be added - and in the core itself there are parts > that could be put as external module. > So, my proposal is writing a parent pom that only includes the > directmemory-cache as submodule. > Does it make sense for you? Yes. I will do that (not sure today but early tomorrow) > TIA, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> some stuff done. >> >> site will be here (http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/) with next sync >> >> I wonder about the current svn tree. >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/directmemory/trunk/ >> >> real project is here >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/directmemory/trunk/directmemory-cache/ >> >> Do we move things on top level ? >> >> 2011/10/13 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: >>> ok I will start that. >>> Note I will move to a lower case for artifactId direct memory-cache >>> rather than DirectMemory-Cache (so svn path will change too) >>> >>> Move java package to org.apache.directmemory >>> >>> 2011/10/13 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: >>>> +1 to all, you are THE man for this! :) >>>> Bonne journée! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hello Folks, >>>>> I'd like to cleanup the maven builds: >>>>> * moving test resources to src/test/resources >>>>> * fix various pom metadata: groupId (org.apache.directmemory), etc >>>>> * include rat plugin >>>>> * setup to deploy snapshots to r.a.o >>>>> * what else ? :-) >>>>> >>>>> Do we agree on using a checstyle configuration and which one ? (I'd >>>>> like to have with all the die files available) >>>>> >>>>> I have setup a jenkins job see >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/directmemory/ >>>>> and a sonar job: >>>>> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.directmemory:DirectMemory-Cache >>>>> >>>>> Comments ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -- >>>>> Olivier Lamy >>>>> Talend : http://talend.com >>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Olivier Lamy >>> Talend : http://talend.com >>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend : http://talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >
-- Olivier Lamy Talend : http://talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
