On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest to make the defragmentation strategy another configurable aspect > and to keep the first option in any case because its both the simplest to > achieve and the one with less runtime overhead. I would call it the > aggressive strategy ;-)
Agree :) Lets get it working, benchmark it and then plan about refining, if needed. cheers ashish
