Cool. And hope you like the new look & feel ;-) Ciao, R
On Sunday, October 23, 2011, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hola Raf! > >> Hey there! >> >>>> Why? Don't you like having the modules enlisted? >> >> Generation didn't get completed and resulted in missing links - I wanted to >> publish some fixes first. Let's fix modules and put it them back online >> > > OK it makes sense! > >>>> This is nice even if it breaks xdoc specification, luckily doesn't block >> site generation! >> >> Site generation works fine (the generated site is online, as you can see), >> and, in any case, any valid xhtml should be allowed there, according to the >> specification. Am I missing something? >> > > IIUC checking the index page against the declared schema[1], <body> > chile elements are <section>. > Anyway like we both wrote, since it doesn't block site generation, can > stay as is. > >>>> + <section name="Disclaimer" aaaclass="alert-message warning"> >>> is this a bug or a feature? :) >> >> I just wanted to comment out that class - which turns in the ugliest double >> orange box I've ever seen :D I'll fix it and push again in svn. >> > > There's not so much we can do from our side, the problem is in the > Doxia plugin that assign to the <h1> element the same class of the > parent <div>. I already filled an issue (that should have already been > fixed) so with next Doxia release that will be automatically fixed. > >> Hope I'm not making too much noise, still learning things... but I think the >> site looks a bit better, now :P >> > > No noise at all, thanks for your effort! > Have a nice weekend! > Simo > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/xsd/xdoc-2.0.xsd >
