Jcs recently had a lot of activities see http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?view=resultlist&path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjcs&plotsort=%24plotsort
no release sure but some dev. 2011/11/8 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>: > I think the problem is the overall lack of activity in JCS. Let's try to > ping them in the ml but I also would like to think about an Avro > distribution mechanism. The basics are very simple - sending updates to the > pointerslist to every partecipating node and asking (from node to node) for > a specific bytearray. Any volounteer for this? > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2011/11/8 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>: >> > Do someone knows them? >> Not personnally :-) >> BTW Simone is a very active commons dev. >> IMHO Maybe you can simply send an email to commons-dev@ ? >> >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> +1 on the join idea. >> >> Just a matter of asking the jcs guy. >> >> >> >> 2011/11/8 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>: >> >> > I like the idea of joining forces with JCS, also, as far as I know, >> since >> >> > it's Apache licensed we could eventually take that same code and port >> it >> >> in >> >> > DM, but obviously I think we should try to avoid it. >> >> > Regarding the distributed cache I know Hadoop offers one so that could >> >> also >> >> > be an option for an off-heap plugin. >> >> > However I personally would be happy also to use NIO and have our own >> way >> >> of >> >> > distributing cache. >> >> > Just some thoughts. >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Tommaso >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2011/11/8 Mir Tanvir Hossain <[email protected]> >> >> > >> >> >> I think it would be a great idea to merge these project to create a >> >> >> complete caching solution. JCS seems to have an excellent disk >> caching >> >> >> support as well. So, the combined project could be a fantastic >> caching >> >> >> solution. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Mir >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < >> >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > This is of course an interesting option - well, we could also >> leverage >> >> >> > indexed disk cache as L3 - and steal indexing and recycling >> >> techniques. >> >> >> > Merging efforts with JCS could bring to the most complete java >> cache >> >> >> > solution in the OS world. I don't have any idea about performance >> of >> >> JCS >> >> >> > and its lateral cache, but it's probably a bit outdated and could >> >> benefit >> >> >> > from a technology refresh (NIO, fast serialization - see Apache >> Avro >> >> as >> >> >> an >> >> >> > example) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mir Tanvir Hossain < >> >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > JCS already has distributed caching option. So, instead of >> >> >> > re-implementing >> >> >> > > the distributed cache, we can integrate tightly with JCS, and >> become >> >> >> its >> >> >> > > off-heap plugin. So, JCS could be the L1 cache, and DirectMemory >> >> could >> >> >> be >> >> >> > > the L2 cache. Just an idea. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > -Mir >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ioannis Canellos < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > I was looking at the jira issues and DIRECTMEMORY-13 - Make >> some >> >> >> > > > investigation about going >> >> >> > > > distributed< >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-13 >> >> > >> >> >> > > > caught >> >> >> > > > my attention. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > I've read about some of the initial thoughts about reusing >> >> features >> >> >> of >> >> >> > > > existing Caches (Hazelcast or Terracotta) but I don't like this >> >> idea >> >> >> so >> >> >> > > > much. >> >> >> > > > We could reuse some of the ides that existing projects use, >> but I >> >> >> think >> >> >> > > > that we should either build it on our own, or use a solution >> not >> >> >> > coupled >> >> >> > > to >> >> >> > > > an existing cache. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > So what are your thought about making direct memory >> distributed? >> >> >> > > > Any thoughts about the consistency model, discovery etc? >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > -- >> >> >> > > > *Ioannis Canellos* >> >> >> > > > * >> >> >> > > > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > ** >> >> >> > > > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > ** >> >> >> > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> >> >> > > > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer >> >> >> > > > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer >> >> >> > > > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer >> >> >> > > > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/ >> > >> >> >> > > Committer >> >> >> > > > * >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Olivier Lamy >> >> Talend : http://talend.com >> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend : http://talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > -- Olivier Lamy Talend : http://talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
