Hi Everyone, after looking into the DirectMemory code, I figured that instead of using MemoryManagerService, I can directly use the CacheService interface. The CacheServiceImpl class seems to do almost all the work. So I am thinking why rewrite the same code? What do you think?
-Mir On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < [email protected]> wrote: > Mir (in cc) volounteered on this task - I think he could start following > your advice to use IndexDiskCache as a template and try to implement it on > top of our MemoryManagerService. I suggest Mir and I subscribe to the > commons mailing lists (I already did) and Thomas (and anyone interested) > subscribes to directmemory-dev to simplify communication. I will open a > jira for the task. > > Ciao, > R > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 09.11.11 00:10, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: >> > This is not so different from an indexed file, just it is in memory - >> maybe >> > you could take a look at the code (which is fairly simple) and get back >> to >> > us with some more targeted questions. >> >> I understand that the plugin is supposed to be added as an auxiliary >> cache module, right? If so, the IndexedDiskCache could be used as a >> template. How do you suggest we proceed? >> >> Bye, Thomas. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
