This is an exception to the general logic that gives direct access to a
clone of the underlying ByteBuffer - basically used to enable NIO access

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara (Commented) (JIRA) <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13192857#comment-13192857]
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara commented on DIRECTMEMORY-43:
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Sorry guys,
> I would have liked to change the current api layout to <K,V> generics.
> Unfortunately there is a logic that I can't understand behind the code.
> If you take a look at CacheServiceImpl (http://goo.gl/Ge8X9) you will see
> that the method retrieve can return a different kind of object than the
> expected one (see line 206).
> Generally speaking, I don't like the api methods which force the user to
> check what he get, and I would like to get rid of them.
> But unfortunately I didn't find a test which documents the need of this
> case.
> Do we really need it?
>
> > Cache should allow key objects instead of plain string
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: DIRECTMEMORY-43
> >                 URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-43
> >             Project: Apache DirectMemory
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >            Reporter: Maurizio Cucchiara
> >            Assignee: Maurizio Cucchiara
> >         Attachments: DIRECTMEMORY-43.patch
> >
> >
> > See http://goo.gl/D4SRN
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>

Reply via email to