Sounds good :) Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara On 14 February 2012 23:03, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again, > > sorry for bugging but I have to take advantage the pet is sleeping, > before she wakes up and I have to get out :P > > I see that the purpose of some classes is having fluent APIs - which I > *adore* - anyway in the current codebase there are some points of > improvements... > > For example: {{Every.seconds(10)}} is not really "sexy", I use to > import static methods to have a functional-alike look in my Java code, > so I propose modifying some APIs to have: > > +--------+ > import static Every.every; > ... > every( 10 ).seconds(); > +--------+ > > that looks more fluent "every then seconds" instead of "every seconds 10"... > > WDYT? It is a trivial improvement but in my short experience sexy APIs > attract people... :P > > TIA, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/
