Namaste Simao, 2012/2/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
> Hola TomNaso, > > For what I can see, it just needs to be moved elsewhere, IMHO > "samples" reduces the effort behind the work you've done ;) > :-) I meant more on the code part; i.e.where the cache size is adapted from the Solr metric (# of docs to be contained) to the DM metric (size on disk). > > Sure, maybe it needs more work before releasing it, anyway we are > still in time :) > > sure, would you go for renaming samples to solr or empty the samples and create a new module solr? I'd go for the first one as right now it wouldn't make sense to have an empty samples module. Tommaso > All the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Tommaso Teofili > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nice idea Simo! > > That needs some work as that impl is very very basic but I agree that may > > be useful as a dedicated module. > > Tommaso > > > > 2012/2/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi all/Tommy > >> > >> as far as I can see, the Solr cache impl you provided is more than a > >> "sample" module... wouldn't worth distribute it, so Solr users can > >> include it in their project? WDYT? > >> > >> -Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> >
