Hi all again, wouldn't be better upgrading the test logging level to WARN? I don't remember where, but I remember one of the good practice is making successfully test silent, the speak just to complain about something...
WDYT? Does it makes sense or I am just inventing? -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Raf, > > I have to pay anyway a beer to everybody for having broken the build :) > > poor me, I think I'll get you all drunk... :D > > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I Did that just to keep logging levels separated for tests and java code - >> but no objection if this gets to a better code. >> >> Ciao, >> R >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> +1 here as well, >>> Tommaso >>> >>> 2012/2/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>> >>> > Hi all again, >>> > >>> > sorry for bugging but just asking a trivial question: I used to put >>> > test classes in the same package (not source dir, eh!) of classes that >>> > need to be tested, in the codebase there are sever tests under >>> > <same_package>.test. >>> > >>> > Is there any objection if I move all of them in the parent package? >>> > That would help reducing the visibility of some classes (like the >>> > default serializer :P) >>> > >>> > TIA, best, >>> > -Simo >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> > http://www.99soft.org/ >>> > >>>
