[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13212435#comment-13212435
]
Simone Tripodi commented on DIRECTMEMORY-65:
--------------------------------------------
I like that patch, anyway can you double check that, once applied, it doesn't
break the Olivier's server?
A little kind request: in the future, can you rename patches with the issue
key, i.e. {{DIRECTMEMORY-65_use-put-only.patch}}, please? It would help us
managing the patches zoo across ASF projects ;)
TIA!
> put vs update - not consistent
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRECTMEMORY-65
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-65
> Project: Apache DirectMemory
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Daniel Manzke
> Attachments: apache dm put.patch
>
>
> There should only be one way to create / update a value. For a cache it makes
> no difference if a key already exists or not. It is like a Map, which only
> has a put and no update method.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
